Though he's an avid soccer fan, an ardent supporter of AFC Wimbledon of England's League One and tries to play 5-a-side twice a week, at the end of the day, Dunster is still an actor. While Dunster's character, Tartt, had the skill - he's depicted as an arrogant yet very good Premier League player in the show - and the bravado to make viewers believe he could pull off the shot, Dunster dug deep to rely on his soccer skill developed as a child.
ESPN+ viewers' guide: LaLiga, Bundesliga, MLS, FA Cup, more Here was the 29-year-old Dunster, last spring, on a pitch at Hayes and Yeading United F.C., just down the street from the West London Film Studios where "Ted Lasso" - which won four Emmys on Sunday night, including Outstanding Comedy Series and Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series, and seven overall - was filmed, trying to replicate not just one of the hardest shots in all of soccer, but trying to emulate one of the best scorers the game has ever seen. He just didn't know exactly how much Ronaldo he was channeling.ĭunster wanted to recreate Ronaldo's famous free-kick goal from the 2009 Champions League semifinal against Arsenal that defied odds, physics and Arsenal keeper Manuel Almunia. When Phil Dunster lined up his free kick from 45 yards as the fictional AFC Richmond striker Jamie Tartt in Apple TV+'s hit show "Ted Lasso," he was summoning his inner Cristiano Ronaldo. 'Ted Lasso' and its Cristiano Ronaldo moment: How the hit show strives to get the soccer right Recent reforms in health care at the federal level offer hope for increased access to treatment services, but otherwise only drug policy rhetoric has changed much.You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser The battles necessary to achieve even modest reductions in these disparities and other overly severe sentencing regimes at the state and federal levels demonstrate how difficult it is to achieve changes in drug policy. The disparities in African American imprisonment rates are higher for drug offenses than for other types of crime some of this disparity results from unjustifiably harsher sentences for crack than for powder cocaine offenses. For cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine there has been an almost relentless increase in the numbers incarcerated for drug offenses, rising from about 50,000 in 1980 to 500,000 in 2010. Marijuana is an important exception: policy and law underwent many changes, with the strong likelihood of more, involving increased legal access to the drug, in the near future. AbstractThough almost universally criticized as overly punitive, expensive, racially disparate in impact, and ineffective, American drug policy remained largely unchanged from 1980 to 2010.
0 kommentar(er)
